What a Falkovia engagement produces
Falkovia does not publish client names. Confidentiality is part of the working agreement. What we can show you is exactly what an engagement produces, the capability your leadership team is left holding, and what the leaders we have worked with say about the work.
What your leadership team walks away owning
Every Architecture Engagement ends with documented infrastructure your team owns and operates. Not a slide deck. Not a dependency on Falkovia. A governance architecture you can run and defend.
A decision authority map
Documented decision rights across every institutional domain, so it is clear who governs which AI decision and where that authority sits.
A documented Human Authority Line™
For each high-risk workflow, the boundary where algorithmic recommendation ends and human judgment must remain non-delegable, written down and defensible.
Override and escalation protocols
Operational protocols your team can actually run when an AI system needs to be challenged, paused, or overridden.
A board-ready governance charter
Written at the level a board of trustees or directors needs to exercise fiduciary oversight. No jargon, clear authority structures and accountability assignments.
A First 90 Minutes Incident Response Protocol
An operational template for the opening of an AI-related incident, before improvisation becomes the plan.
A Shadow AI audit
A department-by-department inventory of approved and unapproved AI use, so you know what is actually running across the institution.
Regulatory and accreditation alignment documentation
Your governance architecture mapped to NIST AI RMF and ISO/IEC 42001 and calibrated to your sector and accreditor.
A maturity baseline and roadmap
An AI Governance Maturity Scorecard™ across the five G.U.A.R.D. dimensions, plus an implementation roadmap with named owners and milestones you can measure against over time.
The outcome that matters most
What leaders say about the work
Attributed by role to protect confidentiality. These are clients and institutional leaders Dr. Masson has worked with.
Dr. Masson designs solutions that make authority and liability defensible rather than ambiguous.
— University President
Dr. Masson creates frameworks that stand up to board, regulator, and public scrutiny.
— University President
Dr. Masson is a rare leader who blends visionary thinking and operational mastery with a commitment to transparency and integrity.
— University President
Dr. Masson brings expertise in the integration of AI into modern healthcare delivery models.
— Healthcare Executive
Dr. Masson brings a detail-oriented approach to translating complex problems into practical, innovative solutions.
— Healthcare Executive
Why the work holds up
The architecture is only as good as the person designing it. The basis of this practice:
Founding university president
Built a medical school from a blank page, designing governance, accreditation strategy, and executive operating infrastructure under conditions where one governance failure could end the institution before it opened.
Forensic psychologist
Two decades in clinical psychology and healthcare leadership, trained to find what others miss in complex evidence and render it defensible under cross-examination. Built for courts. Now built for boards.
Recognized institutional leader
Named Executive of the Year and recognized for governance design and building complex operating structures under pressure and public scrutiny.
Standards-aligned methodology
A library of named instruments, including the G.U.A.R.D. Framework™ and the Human Authority Line™, with every engagement mapped to NIST AI RMF and ISO/IEC 42001.
Trusted before boards and counsel
Has presented on governance before university presidents, general counsel, and heads of accreditation at Alston and Bird, and as a featured speaker for Leadership Women.
Next Step
See what this would produce for your institution.
Every engagement begins with a confidential thirty-minute scoping conversation about what your institution actually needs.
Start a Conversation